Fair use rationale for Image:LeroyHutson.jpg edit

 

Image:LeroyHutson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sources used for the article about Leroy Hutson belong HERE edit

PLEASE INTEGRATE THEM INTO THE ARTICLE::

This is where unused or used-up other sources for reference belong. External links sections are not parking lots! If you are too busy to add to the article, you can at least place the reference here and add it to your watchlists. I haven't yet looked at the 20 or so references from the bottom of the article, but I'm moving them here. Please do the same; they are part of the foundation for developing biography articles, esp. WP:BLPs. Please do the same. When they are used up, just cross them off the lists like this! I haven't checked out all of these to be sure there aren't some acceptable sources we can use -use caution. -

Thank You-- now we can get more into the job at hand! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 17:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply