Talk:Legality of incest in the United States
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in the United States may be able to help! |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laws regarding incest in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160512180238/http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=00001-01000&file=281-289.6 to http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=pen&group=00001-01000&file=281-289.6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
easily-fixed broken links
editIn several cases, we just have to avoid using the most recent wayback version. Alternatively, the new link at https://apps.rainn.org/policy/ may provide more up-to-date info, but it seems slow to render and presents a degree of challenge to find the information of interest. Otherwise, the older version might provide a more easily understood display of the information.
There are some caveats and additional work to be done:
- Some of the links don't actually go to the expected page (link is based on what was provided in current article).
- I haven't compared the data at these links to the laws as stated in the article.
- I also haven't compared the data at these links to other sources of current law.
- It's not clear that the links provided are intended to be persistent.
Here's the list:
- (Nebraska) R.R.S. Neb. § 28-703
- (Nevada) Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 201.180 (note existing link says Nebraska
- (New Jersey) N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2(b-c) and N.J.S.A. 2C:14-3
- (New York) N.Y. Penal Law §130.95
- (Ohio) Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2907.03
- (Oregon) Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.375
- (Virginia) Va. Code § 18.2-361, 18.2-366
Incest
editINCEST IS GOING HARD IN THE USA ALOT SURPRISED NO LAW ENFORCEMENT IS GOING TO ACKNOWLEDGE A INCEST SITUATION IF OCCASIONALLY IT DOESN'T HAVE A DECENT EXPOSURE IT IS GOING TO BE A LEGALIZED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT COMING FROM THE FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BEST DESCRIBED AS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DECISIONS FOR THE USA AS OF NOVEMBER 21 2023 IT IS A CONSENT TO HAVE INCEST IF OCCASIONALLY IT DOESN'T CONSENT AND GETS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT NON CONSENTING PERSON WILL HAVE TO PRESS CHARGES AND PROCESS WILL SPEAK FOR ITS SELF. 97.78.195.98 (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)