Talk:Lead contamination in Washington, D.C., drinking water

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2018 and 11 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AMM1989.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Delete, merge, or redirect? edit

The topic of this article is covered in some detail at the main article for the DC Water and Sewer Authority. I was thinking of proposing a deletion or merge.--Koppas (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I propose that District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority#Controversy be merged into this article. The length of that section is starting to become WP:UNDUE. Per WP:SPINOFF, it would be better to leave a summary-style stub in the Sewer Authority article, and put the story of the lead contamination here. Also, the lead issue isn't just a problem for the Sewer Authority; it dragged the EPA and CDC down with it, too. See, for example, the writeup I added to Marc Edwards (civil engineering professor). (That should be liberally raided, too.) // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 02:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
yes, agree, move all that material here, and rewrite a summary there. also take material from Marc Edwards (civil engineering professor). 98.163.75.189 (talk) 02:20, 18 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've boldly gone ahead and performed the spinoff. I will work on cleaning up the merged text; it needs a good bit of work. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

see also edit

given the recent flint michigan lead crisis, this article should reference it.--Patbahn (talk) 04:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply