Talk:Lazer Team

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 98.74.166.198 in topic Order of Cast

Who plays the four idiots? edit

Who exactly play the four 'Idiots" again? I think that should be mentioned in the plot of who they are and who play their roles. SilentDan (talk) 12:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The lazer team are the four idiots, it's in the cast section. The plot summary needs a reworking in general, but it doesn't need cast specifics. Sock (tock talk) 14:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Budget? edit

Burnie has said on the podcast, though I do not recall the episode, that what was raised was not the entire budget of the film. And that the campaign wasn't to fund the movie, but to better fund the movie. And that they also raised money through traditional film budget ways. So the budget that is there does not reflect the total budget. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.37.215 (talk) 03:59, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

That's true, I'll add a note that that is simply the crowd funded total and obviously company funds and Fulscreen funds will also be paying toward it. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Release Date edit

@Sock: Ok since you apparently can't read the source here it is all higlighted nice for you. Learn to check sources before refuting a persons edit. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Odd, my finder didn't see that word. Probably because this is the link for source 9, not the link you just screencapped. Thanks for the rude tone, by the way. Also, you apparently enjoy selective reading of sources. The sentence directly before it, which you blocked out with your circle, says "Australia won as the top country to donate the most and thus they get an international premiere! To be hosted in Melbourne at a time yet to be determined but most likely late summer of 2015." Meaning that the Australian premiere will happen at some point, but most likely late summer of 2015. That is not the same as confirmation. Please work on being civil, as well, as you've been unnecessarily aggressive over a small disagreement. Sock (tock talk) 03:03, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Sock: Well in that case lets remove 2015 all together because they actually only said that is the expected release date. Also I was aiming at ref 8 which directly follows the release date text, makes sense considering thats how references work... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
@EoRdE6: That's fine with me. Please drop the snark. We're trying to work this out. Also, your edit summary said ref 9, so that's where I looked. I probably should've checked 8 as well, but I assumed the specific information was located in 9 based on your summary. Sock (tock talk) 03:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Order of Cast edit

Since {{pig|Sock}} (Obviously meant   xD) decided to change it I thought I would ask, what is the standard for ordering the cast? It was in alphabetical just for simplicity, while the MoS gives many different ways it can be done (bluelinks, alphabet, role in movie, popularity) but none about the order in the source... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to assume that "pig" instead of "ping" was a typo. The cast order in the infobox is quite a mess for unreleased films, but it usually goes by either a film's trailer (who's credited during the trailer, or if there's a credit block at the end) or a film's official website, like in this case. Alphabetical is very rarely used. As for the cast section, that usually goes by credits order (opening credits getting priority), but since we don't have opening credits yet, we can just use the website as well. Sock (tock talk) 03:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Haha indeed it was a typo but now I really want to make a template pig just for the laughs... 98.74.166.198 (talk) 03:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC) Oops I'm not logged in, User:EoRdE6Reply