Talk:Laurence Hyde, 1st Earl of Rochester
Latest comment: 14 years ago by WildeRochester in topic New Creation?
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Creation? edit
New Creation? How does John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester fit in? Deb 12:01, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- A different creation of the earldom, which became extinct upon his death, I think. john 19:35, 25 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- This is an error. Laurence Hyde was the third Earl of Rochester. Henry Wilmot was the first Earl of Rochester and the infamous John Wilmot--Henry's son--was the second. The title I believe then became extinct after Laurence Hyde. This needs fixing.WildeRochester (talk) 08:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)WildeRochester
New copy of painting edit
I've uploaded a different copy of the painting that is the lead picture in this article (right). Feel free to choose whichever one you prefer. Dcoetzee 22:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)