Talk:Lashkendar
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Timberframe in topic Status of Abkhazia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lashkendar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Status of Abkhazia
editTo the best of my knowledge (and I am NOT an expert at all), the ownership of Abkhazia is disputed. (At least according to Abkhazia.) If there's been a change in that, please let me know, otherwise I'll change the tone of that sentence in a few days. Just posting here rather than being Bold since I imagine some people have strong feelings about it. --Bfigura (talk) 05:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Isn't it written clearly enough about the status of Abkhazia? (de facto independent republic internationally recognised as part of Georgia). This is one of the accepted terms in Wikipedia and is used not only here but in a lot of other articles related to Abkhazia (starting with the intro of the Abkhazia article). Alæxis¿question? 07:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- The status of Abkhazia has no relevance to the article as it stands, so I can see no good reason for including this statement or any variants on it in this article. I'm sure that talk is right that "some people have strong feelings about it" but this article isn't the appropriate place to vent them (in fact neither is wikipedia period.) I've deleted it. -- Timberframe (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)