Talk:Lancelot of Navarre
Latest comment: 9 months ago by DirtyHarry991 in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Lancelot of Navarre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by DirtyHarry991 talk 08:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that King Charles III wanted his illegitimate son Lancelot to become a bishop but the pope forbade it? Source: "Entretanto Carlos III hizo gestiones para encumbrar a la mitra a su candidato favorito ... El papa Luna doró la negativa..."[1]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Fifth Chinese Daughter
- Comment: Some hooks just write themselves.
Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 17:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lancelot of Navarre; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Long enough, new enough (nominated day after creation), QPQ done. Hook is an interesting tidbit of history, I like that it demonstrates the power of the papacy at the time. I am not a Spanish speaker, but a quick google translate seems to validate the fact using the supplied quote. One small gripe I have is that it was an antipope who rejected the proposition, but that is probably splitting hairs (plus, from Charles' viewpoint, the Roman Pope would have been the antipope). That notwithstanding, this gets the green check and a "thank you" for the interesting read! Fritzmann (message me) 16:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
