Talk:Lackluster

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 82.1.159.160 in topic Advertorial

Untitled edit

ok, what exactly should be added into this - please discuss. i can dig up all the info required - but i dont know what to add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.248.244.143 (talk) 11:34, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lackluster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lackluster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Advertorial edit

Obviously this article should be deleted as spam, but in the mean time it needs to be pruned of self-promotion added by user:Esaruoho (the subject) and the obviously-associated IPs. Discogs is not a RS, it is user-edited. Virtually the entire article is drawn form Discogs and websites associated with Ruoho. I removed this, but was reverted (because how could an IP possibly be expected to understand WP:RS, WP:PROMO and the like, right?) so now I have to come to a talk page which has no active editors or watchers and achieve consensus, presumably with the apsmmer who write the autobiography. 82.1.159.160 (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

    • There are reliable sources for him such as a staff written bio on AllMusic so you cut too much without bothering to look for extra sources, his discography should remain for example but the list of equipment and artists mixed can go imv, and the prose needs to be written based on reliable sources, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:20, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
It's not up to me to pad out his lovingly crafted advertisement. Any material that fails the test of good sourcing, can, should, and indeed must be removed. If you want to reintroduce it with better sourcing, obviously not AMG as that is also a PR tool, but real stuff in NME or whatever, then you are most welcome. The point is that this article is an advertisement based almost entirely on affiliated and unreliable sources, so the first step, in line with Wikipedia policy, is to strip that out - even stub it if necessary - to achieve neutrality and comply with core policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.159.160 (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply