Talk:LNWR 2-2-2 3020 Cornwall
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability of preserved steam locomotives edit
Please read my thread started at Talk:LMS 5MT Black 5 44806#Notability of preserved steam locomotives, thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Cornwall edit
Cornwall is notable in her own right. She was a famous engine in her day, she was so famous when obsolete that she became an extremely rare early preservation, even at a time when we were over-run with engines. If for no other reason, she'd still be notable today even if she'd gone to the scrapper in the '60s. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- Then where are the references? The only reference in the stub so far is a link to a rail buff site. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The references are on the desk in front of me, waiting for a spare minute while I enter content into another article that you've threatened with imminent deletion. There are limits on how fast I can type. You have a template for deleting articles, those of us who contribute by adding content have to do it the hard way. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)