Talk:LGBT rights in Ghana

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 8 October 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MD380. Peer reviewers: DVNewlin22.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 16 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DrewTamez.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

RFC on LGBT rights in Africa

Editors are invited to participate in an RFC concerning this article at Talk:LGBT rights under international law#Duplicated text on countries' obligations under international law. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, @AfricaTanz:. It seems you have been reinserting the same and similar templated information which was the subject of the above-noted RFC. The consensus there seemed to be that much of your material is original research or novel synthesis, and/or not directly relevant to country-specific articles such as this one. I removed the material which didn't seem to be relevant to Ghana, asking in my edit summary that you discuss the matter at Talk:LGBT rights under international law#Duplicated text on countries' obligations under international law before reinserting it. I assume you overlooked that message when you reverted me without explanation. I'm posting this message here (which includes a notification for you) to ensure that you're aware of the objections to your edits, and that you are requested to discuss them with the community. Some of the information you are trying to post may be appropriate if it were worded differently and/or placed in a different article. The best way of reworking it into something usable will be to engage with your fellow editors on the RFC. —Psychonaut (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

I just replaced the text with content that I believe is in just the right measure for this article, stripped the material that deals with a scope much higher than the one country, and I reworded the heading to be neutral and factual rather than prescriptive and preachy. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Both of your efforts to whitewash and exclude information directly relevant to LGBT rights in Ghana are appalling. First you do it based on alleged (and false) copyright violations. Then you do it based on nothing more than "I don't like material that appears in more than one article, even if the material is directly relevant". For anyone who wants to read this important material free of bias, see this version. AfricaTanz (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

"Relevant" in the same sense that it would be relevant to load every article about a person who had ever been arrested for drunk driving with four paragraphs about the jurisdiction's drunk driving laws. "Nothing more than ..."? I told you it was more than that and I advised you to try mentioning it while keeping it brief and directly relevant, linking to it elsewhere, so don't sit there publicly mischaracterizing my rationale. As for "whitewashing", well, you could use a little dose of WP:Assume good faith. I'm gay and have been a gay rights advocate for 30+ years. I also believe the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution ought to have been sufficient to do away with all inequitable treatment by the Federal and state governments of LGBT people, up to and including bans on same-sex marriage, the instant any case relating to LGBT inequality came to any court in the country, but I also would object to someone posting the same generic pontification about the Equal Protection Clause in every article on LGBT affairs in individual states. And, really, if I was whitewashing, would I have restored this part (while keeping it short and sweet)? So if you can only be satisfied by believing I have an agenda to hide something, go ahead and believe it, but you're wrong. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on LGBT rights in Ghana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120724212608/http://ilga.org/ilga/en/countries/GHANA/Law to http://ilga.org/ilga/en/countries/GHANA/Law
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111230745/http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/us-offers-ghana-assistance-moving-forward-lgbt-rights071013 to http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/us-offers-ghana-assistance-moving-forward-lgbt-rights071013
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226070227/http://adoption.state.gov/country_information/country_specific_info.php?country-select=ghana to http://adoption.state.gov/country_information/country_specific_info.php?country-select=ghana
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109213152/http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/187/36/PDF/G1218736.pdf?OpenElement to http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/187/36/PDF/G1218736.pdf?OpenElement

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)