Talk:Kurihara, Miyagi

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:58, April 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Districts and municipalities task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

"was" not appropriate edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The multiple people rushing in to change "is" to "was" and everything else to past tense throughout the article (each time it is reverted) are acting in such unbelievably poor taste that it stretches belief. Wait until major reliable sources start referring to the city in the past tense--weeks or months or years from now--before making this change. The mass destruction of buildings where people were living until that moment just hours ago (if that is what is happening) does not suddenly mean the city no longer exists. 216.243.36.196 (talk) 09:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Level of destruction edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

See Talk:2011 Sendai earthquake and tsunami#Kurihara for a discussion of the reliability of the earlier reports of destruction. The "Completely Destroyed" report came from a private web site and was based solely on a JMA seismic intensity scale measurement of 7, not on any actual reported damage -- 110.49.251.174 (talk) 11:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Good catch. - Drlight11 (talk) 12:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic