Talk:Kudumbi

Kudumbi or Kudumbis

Two article created with same name, inviting a third person to comment which one should keep?

Merger proposal discussion

here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avineshjose (talk • contribs) 09:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The sentence -'Who belong to sudra varna'- is factually wrong, politically incorrect and illegal. Nobody can classify a group of people or tribe with this classification created historically by Brahmins only for their selfish motives is a contempt to the people of India. Chaturvarnya classification is irrational, unscientific and illegal.So deleted that part.And there is no evidence that Kudumbis can considered as sudra as per chaturvarnya classification itself.Like majority of people and sects in India,Kudumbies are outside chaturvarnya or casteless.Whoever classifying any sects as per Chaturvarnya classification should ready to face legal action from Indian government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.52.119 (talk) 19:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

If "kudumbis" practice fugdi dance and are involved in temple processions, then no way are they of the Goan Kunbi tribe. "Kudumbi" appears to be a corruption of "Kulambini" a.k.a. Kalawantin (see Gomantak Maratha Samaj. 49.15.229.56 (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Sinkari melam

Dear Brother Santhosh,

I believe that Sinkari melam is one of the cultural contribution made by Kudumbi Community to the recent Kerala culture. It has became popular with in a short span of time ie. 5 to 6 years only. There was article in Mathrubhumi daily around 5 years back regarding its origin. Now Sinkari Melam has become part of all cultural functions of Kerala irrespective of caste and religion. Hence I believe same can be mentioned in the page as same is a contribution by the Kudumbi community to the culture of Kerala. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umarejith (talk • contribs) 03:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyedit

Hello everyone, I'm working hard on the copyedit for this page. I'm not an expert in any way on this subject. Please let me know if the copyediting process produces anything that is not accurate and I will correct. Also, I don't have any political or religious bias but I do think the article must be worked towards a very neutral tone. Kind regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 10:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Dear me, what happened here? The copyedit tag surely goes back on! Myrtle G. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 12:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kudumbi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AuZa3KAj-AzYJ%3Awww.kerala.gov.in%2Findex.php%3Foption%3Dcom_docman&task=doc_download&gid=4892&Itemid=2702%20&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100413214342/http://www.gsbkerala.com/gsbhistory.htm to http://www.gsbkerala.com/gsbhistory.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kudumbi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714154602/http://m.newindianexpress.com/kerala/310131 to http://m.newindianexpress.com/kerala/310131
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223213035/http://samyukta.info/site/book/export/html/136 to http://samyukta.info/site/book/export/html/136
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070604205151/http://www.goatourism.org/History/mythology.htm to http://www.goatourism.org/History/mythology.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Better sources needed

A lot of information given in the citations don't correspond to historical records about Goa. Hindu Goans don't celebrate Holi, although they have a similar festival called Shigmo. Also, the Portuguese didn't ban Kudumbi language (is the article in The Hindu talking about Konkani or something else?) in 1864, so their claims about language ban leading to migration isn't possible. Anti-Hindu laws were also scrapped by that time. If Kudumbis are really migrants from Goa to Kerala, then their reason for leaving in the late 1800s was probably economic and not religious or cultural. 2402:8100:317C:3623:1550:B730:9C03:324A (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)