Talk:Kronecker limit formula

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Mark viking in topic mistake in 2nd part?

mistake in 2nd part?

edit

The formula for the eisenstein series in the second par thas no dependence on v —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.97.19.56 (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing this out. This mistake has corrected (see page 21 of the Seigel book for the full story). --Mark viking (talk) 20:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply