Talk:Kollektsioner
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Michael Romanov in topic Kollektsioner is not magazine
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kollektsioner is not magazine edit
15:29, 17 June 2015 Randykitty (talk | contribs) . . (5,171 bytes) (-13) . . (Undid revision 667361844 by Michael Romanov (talk) Please do not add non-existing cats; we have cat "philatelic journals" and "philatelic magazines", this falls in the latter)
- The fact is that Kollektsioner is NOT magazine. It is an annual philatelic research journal. What's the point in introducing Category:Philatelic magazines? I am returning Kollektsioner to Category:Philatelic journals. --Michael Romanov (talk) 20:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- We use "journal" here as short for "academic journal". This periodical is not peer-reviewed, hence it is a magazine, not a journal. Just like The Wall Street Journal, despite its title, is a newspaper, not an academic journal. --Randykitty (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Wait a minute. Following this rationale, ALL Category:Philatelic journals are NOT academic journals. Why don't you recategorize ALL Category:Philatelic journals? Please go ahead and make them magazines since they are NOT peer-reviewed by academicians. --Michael Romanov (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)