This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kinked demand article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Kinked demand appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
- Any applicable WikiProject tags? Smee 17:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
- tagged Cretog8 (talk) 20:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Meaning
editI'm sorry but I started to read this and it makes no sense whatsoever.
I realise that anyone coming here looking for this may know a little about the subject, but surely this could be made a little more reader-friendly for the rest of us?
Suggestions?
editAre there any suggestions on how this could be made more friendly to the casual reader?
i think it can be made more reader friendly by giving examples such as this type of model applies to FMCG s such as pepsi and lays. . . Radhika Asrani BetsyWalls 00:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
So what's the "Chicago theory"?
editThe quote in the criticism section says:
Stigler also asserts that the model is unnecessary because Chicago theory already included allowances for short-run sticky prices due to collusion, menu costs, and regulatory or bureaucratic inefficiencies in markets
So what is this "Chicago theory"? I couldn't find a WP article about it, but I believe it would benefit the casual reader if more information was available on what it means.
Thanks, nyenyec ☎ a casual reader 16:18, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
formatting error
editPlease correct the quote error in the formatting of the CRITICISM section
G. Robert Shiplett 02:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
merge Price point into Kinked demand
editmerge Price point into this Kinked demand article. Jonpatterns (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Image
editThe image for this article makes no sense and I'm sure is a mistake. Any ideas on what to replace it with? Paoshf (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2021 (UTC)