Talk:King's School, Rochester

March 2007

Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, as it appears to be one of the oldest schools in England, then I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of High on this importance scale.

My reasoning is as follows: This article is small at the moment. But this is a very old school Victuallers 14:34, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Heads up: References needed

Soon I'm going to start challenging claims made in this article. Any claims that cannot be verified using reliable sources will be removed. If nearly every claim in the article proves to be unverifiable, I'll take the article to Articles for deletion.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay, this is an important school and needs to be in Wikipedia; however there is some subtle vandalism in the article. I'm confident that Snoopy was never a Roffensian. The only way to reliably defend an article against vandalism is to use the citations, but the citations have to be there first.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 21:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

References required

Per Wikipedia guidelines, WP:RS, references are required for additions to this article.--Mumia-w-18 (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

how much money does this school cost? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.47.252.105 (talk) 06:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Slander

Or is it libel? Either way, can legal action be taken against IP addresses etc. making unfounded accusations in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.57.113 (talk) 04:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's School, Rochester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110130064400/http://www.kings-rochester.co.uk/History.aspx to http://www.kings-rochester.co.uk/History.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Citations for verification template

I see there is a citations needed template above the article. As far as I can see, all facts are correct and relatively up to date and nothing is marked as 'citation needed'. Can anyone provide me with information regarding to what needs to be verified as I can find the relevant sources, but I am unsure what should be verified etc.. If I don't get any responses after a suitable period of time, I will remove the citations template.

All opinions helpful :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mutleymuffin (talk • contribs) 20:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

If you look at the "Site" and "Houses" sections, which constitute most of the article, there are zero references. These are the parts that need references. The "Headmasters" section also has zero references, so some would be nice there as well. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on King's School, Rochester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kings-rochester.co.uk/History.aspx
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ofchoristers.net/Chapters/Rochester.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kings-rochester.co.uk/3-to-8-Pastoral-Care.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510021115/http://www.ofchoristers.net/Chapters/Rochester.htm to http://www.ofchoristers.net/Chapters/Rochester.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's School, Rochester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110205120454/http://www.orderofstjustus.com/Why%20an%20Order.htm to http://www.orderofstjustus.com/Why%20an%20Order.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)