| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | On 18 October 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kim Ji-woong (entertainer) to Kim Ji-woong. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 18 October 2024
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Kim Ji-woong (entertainer) → Kim Ji-woong – Proposing Kim Ji-woong (entertainer) be moved to Kim Ji-woong usurping the disambiguation.
Guidelines indicate that these two articles should be disambiguated with a hatnote rather than a standalone disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER.
Over the last year, entertainer has received 470x more average daily pageviews than Kim Ji-woong (footballer) so clear primary topic (WP:PT1), and clickstream shows almost all traffic to Kim Ji-woong proceeds to entertainer. Footballer is a 6 word stub with no citations that could probably be brought to AfD. RachelTensions (talk) 01:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, paired with Kim Ji-woong → deleted to make room for move. The entertainer has an article with 32 inline cites, while the entry for Kim Ji-woong (footballer) is an uncited six-word stub. A hatnote atop the entertainer's entry would indeed suffice. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: as per above. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 05:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. SnowKang (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hatnote
edit@HypeBoy heads up, part of the accepted consensus (see above) was that a hatnote be placed on the article directing people to Kim Ji-woong (footballer). The whole jist of WP:ONEOTHER is that one article receives substantially more views than another - if pageview stats mattered for whether or not two articles with the same name receive hatnotes then almost none under WP:ONEOTHER would receive them.
The hatnote is the alternative to having a whole disambiguation page (which is what this article previously had) RachelTensions (talk) 01:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- @RachelTensions: Didn't notice the discussion above. If there's consensus between editors, then policy doesn't matter as much per WP:IGNORE. Have restored your version. Cheers. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 01:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)