Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Tayi Arajakate in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kidnap (2017 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Kidnap (2017 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 27, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Writing
editI haven't seen the movie, so I can't really do this myself, but the writing is very hard to understand (and contains numerous errors). Samer (talk) 04:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The Call similarities
editShouldn't the heavy similarities between The Call (2013 film) and this film be referenced somewhere, except for a mention in the 'See also' section? Are they connected in any way (It would surprise me if they weren't)? It seems almost comical seeing both posters side by side. -Throast (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I will take up the review for this nomination and present it to you in some time. Tayi Arajakate Talk 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I've completed the review. The article more or less meets the good article criteria but there are a couple minor issues which need to be resolved before I can promote it, primarily the first one listed in the comments. Good work on the article in general! Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- The issues are resolved now so I'll promote the article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I've completed the review. The article more or less meets the good article criteria but there are a couple minor issues which need to be resolved before I can promote it, primarily the first one listed in the comments. Good work on the article in general! Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
edit- The last four producers and the editor mentioned in the infobox are not mentioned in those roles (or not mentioned at all) in the body nor are they cited in the infobox. Di Bonaventura Pictures is abbreviated as "di B Pictures" in the infobox, the shouldn't it be "dB Pictures"?
Working
Done 1. Added Panic Room format. 2. The company is credited as "di B Pictures" in the poster. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- "... with Halle Berry attached to star ..." The use of "attached to" in the phrase sounds odd, I would suggest using "featured as" instead. I would also suggest adding a comma before the "with".
- "... while still owing the feature itself $15 million ..." This phrase isn't very clear. I would suggest adding a "worth" after itself.
Assessment
edit- Comprehension: The comprehension is good.
- Verifiability: The article is verifiable.
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
- Neutrality: The article is neutral.
- Stability: The article is stable.
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | The prose is generally clear, concise and understandable. | Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The article has a list of references and in-line citations for its contents in the body. | Pass
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | Sources used are reliable. | Pass
|
| (c) (original research) | No original research found. | Pass
|
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No flagrant copyright issues found. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The article broadly covers all major aspects. | Pass
|
| (b) (focused) | The article is focused without unnecessary deviations. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| No ongoing content disputes or edit wars present. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | No copyright issues found, images are appropriately tagged. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Use and caption are good. | Pass
|