Talk:Kenny Vadas
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editAdded the cleanup tag, as the article looks like a mess. Am also unsure as to how much that should actually be included in the article as well. Bjelleklang - talk 02:40, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
what do you mean? Marquita188 - talk 06:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Cleanup tag
editHere are the issues I see that need cleaning up.
- The intro paragraph needs to be wikifyed, all the TV shows should be linked, use italics for TV show names instead of double quotes, link the various TV networks
- Second External links section right in the middle of the article.
- Favorite things section has completely the wrong tone, this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not an article in Teen Beat magazine, the section should be removed.
- The tone of the update section is also not encyclopedic, the section should probably be merged into the intro paragraph, no need for "Updates" on a site which can be updated at any time.
- Resume section should be changed to use standard wiki formating, numbers removed.
- Several redlink categories, should either be removed or created properly.
Qutezuce 20:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Is this actor really notable enough to warrant his own wiki article? Most of this information is nonencyclopedic (Robert DiNiro's favorite color or fast food restaurant would be removed from his page as irrelevent, why should this actor be any different? Ionesco 16:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Eric's world.jpg
edit
Image:Eric's world.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
