Talk:Ken Mascara

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Mascara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080409001103/http://www.flaccreditation.org/Biographies/bio%20ken%20mascara.htm to http://www.flaccreditation.org/Biographies/bio%20ken%20mascara.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Removing maintenance template

@Stluciesheriff, Ashleyyoursmile, and Ifnord:

The article just does not seem to be suffering from the issues from back in 2014. Maybe, maybe, maybe there is a COI problem. If there is, Stluciesheriff (or anyone else for that matter) should disclose, as the WP:COI guidelines suggests. On the other hand, and maybe this is silly to think, it's just an interested party without COI.

If you disagree, I will not take a revert personally. Rklahn (talk) 06:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

No disagreement regarding removal of the tag. I think the COI remains but the article, as it now, appears grossly neutral and doesn't require an ugly maintenance box. Ifnord (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

"grossly neutral" is a really good way to say it, and started me down the road of removing the box. Anyhow, thanks for stopping by. Rklahn (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)