Talk:Kells (band)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some of the things that would lengthen this article include:

• Biography
• Musical style
• Lyrics and themes
• Influences
• Tours
• History of the name and the design of the band look
• ETHS connections
• Videos — Preceding unsigned comment added by RhetorDayna (talk • contribs) 16:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)