| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled
editI deleted this information:
'convenor of the London Socialist Historians Group and'
because I don't know what a 'convenor' is and I couldn't look it up in an online Encyclopedia. If I am in error or this is typo then please put it back or fix it. Hdstubbs 04:36, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Convenor, noun, Somebody who convenes or chairs a meeting.
(Source: http://www.allwords.com/word-convenor.html)
Davidbober 16:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Criticisms
editI have just deleted the Criticisms section of the article because it was unsourced. Per WP:BLP, "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons — whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable — should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion, from Wikipedia articles, talk pages, user pages, and project space".
The material can of course be reinstated if references to reliable sources are included. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Notable?
editHow is Flett "notable"? Because he writes letters to British newspapers? I'd recommend deletion if I could be bothered to go through the procedure to do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.154.153 (talk) 17:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Sign your bloody posts! Only Trolls post anonymously. 124.168.148.197 (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- Anybody who has similar published output to Flett's is "notable", simply by being in the public eye. In addition, it appears that his writings are taken at least semi-seriously by the British reading public. Hold your deletion recommendation, OK? Thanks in advance. Raymondwinn (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2010 (UTC)