Talk:Katherine Fernandez Rundle

Latest comment: 8 years ago by TommyBoy in topic Political Affiliation

Untitled

edit

Please don't take this the wrong way, but the current text sounds like a political campaign ad. Wikipedia has a neutral point of view policy that forbids the introduction of articles that are biased either for or against a particular person or subject. --Tachikoma 02:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Go figure, it was copied from her bio at the State Attorney's Website Montco 02:18, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Gotta start somewhere...--HamiMiami 02:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
That's why I didn't want to immediately ask for the article's deletion. If you or other editors care to rework the text in the future, that's fine. --Tachikoma 02:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Did she attend UF

edit

According to womenoftommorow.org she went to the University of Miami before Cambridge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.183.140 (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The "Miami Model" - the US most aggressive policing tactics “a model … for the rest of the world to emulate in the future when these sort of events take place.”

edit

Political Affiliation

edit

I have noticed inconsistent information on Wikipedia regarding Katherine Fernandez Rundle's political affiliation on Wikipedia. This article is included in Category:Florida Republicans, but her name is also included on List of Democratic Party superdelegates, 2016. If any of my fellow Wikipedians could find a reliable source for her political affiliation, and update either article accordingly, it would be appreciated.--TommyBoy (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

She's a Democrat. Here's one source from 2012 mentioning her re-election victory in the Democratic primary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingerc (talkcontribs) 07:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for confirming her correct political affiliation. Upon further investigation, I have determined that this article was added to the Florida Republicans category by a user who was subsequently blocked for sock puppetry, and I have updated the article with the correct information.--TommyBoy (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply