Talk:Karen Walton
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Untitled edit
I thoroughly enjoyed reading this article. It was very well written and i appreciated the use to detail in describing her career and awards. I found that this person could have explored more of her movies. Maybe explore all the movies shes done (or at least a few). I also found that there was a bit of repition. She is descrbied as a Halifax writer twice. Maybe edit out the parts that have already been mentioned! but otherwise, it was very well layed out and super interesting to read and it shows you put lots of thought into your article! :)
The article of Karen Walton is a very great example of a thoughtful article. It is highly descriptive on Karen’s journey as a screenwriter. I enjoyed reading about her journey through the business starting from Halifax to becoming a part of great film like Ginger snaps. The article was highly descriptive in the multiple awards that she has received as well as the success and controversies over Karen’s work in Ginger Snaps. Though I do feel that the article is descriptive, I feel that the career portion of the article is primarily focused on Ginger snaps. After reading her filmography, there were many great films she was a part of. To detail more about her career, you should explain the success of other films she has worked on instead of focusing her whole career section on Ginger Snaps. It would be interesting if you also described more her process into becoming a screenwriter. Wheteher she grew up wanting to write, if she started with small gigs, etc. Overall the artcle was very interesting and gave a detailed description on Karen Walton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjwalkman (talk • contribs) 00:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The article on Karen
The article of Karen Walton is a very great example of a thoughtful article. It is highly descriptive on Karen’s journey as a screenwriter. I enjoyed reading about her journey through the business starting from Halifax to becoming a part of great film like Ginger snaps. The article was highly descriptive in the multiple awards that she has received as well as the success and controversies over Karen’s work in Ginger Snaps. Though I do feel that the article is descriptive, I feel that the career portion of the article is primarily focused on Ginger snaps. After reading her filmography, there were many great films she was a part of. To detail more about her career, you should explain the success of other films she has worked on instead of focusing her whole career section on Ginger Snaps. It would be interesting if you also described more her process into becoming a screenwriter. Wheteher she grew up wanting to write, if she started with small gigs, etc. Overall the artcle was very interesting and gave a detailed description on Karen Walton. Valentina valentine (talk) 03:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC) Valentina Valentine
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alice10flowers. Peer reviewers: Valentina valentine, Jjwalkman.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)