- The following discussion is an archived debate . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The second paragraph of the introduction is completely unsourced and sounds highly biased. If there is no objection, I will delete it. --Westwind273 (talk) 14:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
- Seeing no objection, I have been bold and removed the unsourced material. --Westwind273 (talk) 05:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
-
- Your revert is cavalier and unjustified. Do you have any undisclosed conflicts of interest, like an affiliation with Harvard? I notice from your talk page that you have a history of this. There should probably be some Wikipedia action taken against your editor status. --Westwind273 (talk) 17:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Major parts of this article read like a PR piece for Kayyem, not an unbiased view of her career. And the biggest boasting is all unsourced. "Kayyem has an extensive background in terrorism and national security affairs." Says who? She left DHS after only 18 months, perhaps due to incompetence. It seems this article is being prevented from improvement by certain editors at Harvard who clearly have view of Kayyem that is biased in her favor. --Westwind273 (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
