Talk:Julie Goodwin

Speedy Deletion

The article was orginally created by someone else, I have since improved it so it has some content on it. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 06:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed merge

Where is the encyclopedic content for this article? At this stage, all that can be said about the subject is best said in the main article. If and when the subject acquires notability independent of her appearance on a game show, then perhaps a stand-alone article may be appropriate. Until that time, this article is best redirected to MasterChef Australia. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 22:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

It's being expanded, give it time in the next week or so. Poh has got a bit on hers re Masterchef.--Mikecraig (talk) 23:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Mikecraig. Julie is clearly notable here, as theres quite a bit on Google News about her. Theres articles about both the winners of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire, so that, I believe, sets a clear precedent. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

• Merge. Clearly struggling for content, with references to family and her "movie career". Direct back to program article until/if she is notable for more than WP:ONEEVENT. WWGB (talk) 01:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Um, movie career? I think you've got the wrong article. Rebecca (talk) 03:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
    • No, this Internet Movie Database entry is listed under External links. WWGB (talk) 03:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• Merge anything useful into the massively spammy Masterchef Australia. Goodwin is currently notable only for winning the contest. Individual notabiltiy is not "inherited" by being associated with other notable topics, nor is notability conferred from being mentioned in relation to one event. Current news articles are entirely in the context of Masterchef - there's no suggestion Goodwin was otherwise notable enough to receive signifciant coverage in reliable sources. Euryalus (talk) 02:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

• Merge While she did win MasterChef Australia it doesn't automatically make her notable for an encyclopaedia. Poh on the other hand is somewhat more notable then Julie but she may become notable in time but at the moment she's not notable for Wikipedia. Bidgee (talk) 02:05, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. The reason this article has relatively little content (compared to the far superior article on the less notable Poh Ling Yeow) is because well-meaning people keep redirecting the article every bloody day. There's an abundance of reliable sources about her specifically as opposed to the show, and there's no excuse for a merge. Rebecca (talk) 03:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - per Rebecca. The runner up has a better and sourced article despite being less notable than the winner. --Sb617 (talk · contribs) 03:37, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Family Company Website

I had originally removed this link believing it to be too promotional for this article (especially for the infobox). If the company itself had an article it should go there, but I'm not so sure for Julie Goodwin's page, despite it being her family business... Jwoodger (talk) 06:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julie Goodwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090727192147/http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0%2C28383%2C25807233-10229%2C00.html?referrer=email&source=eDM_newspulse to http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0%2C28383%2C25807233-10229%2C00.html?referrer=email&source=eDM_newspulse

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)