Talk:Julian Ewell

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Billmckern in topic A moniker he would be proud of

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Ewell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A moniker he would be proud of edit

@A bicyclette: and I have gone back and forth on whether this description should be included in the article. I just can't see it. Un-encyclopedic, biased, or something else - take your pick of arguments against it, but I don't think it belongs.

Does anyone else care to comment? If so, please let us know what you think. I'd rather try to build a consensus than get into an edit war.

Thanks,

Billmckern (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@A bicyclette: No one else appears to have an opinion one way or the other. I edited the relevant passage to provide some more details that I think put the nickname into the right context. Let me know whether this works for you.
Billmckern (talk) 13:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply