Talk:Joseph Calleja

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joseph Calleja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140319162551/http://www.decca.com/newsitems/6894/ to http://www.decca.com/newsitems/6894/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120715/social/Ronan-dines-at-Villa-Parisio.428668

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Calleja. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006023444/http://www.decca.com/artists/joseph-calleja-352 to http://www.decca.com/artists/joseph-calleja-352

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Investigation of potential copyright issue

I called up this page and saw the warning - > The previous content of this page or section has been identified as posing a potential copyright issue, as a copy or modification of the text from the source(s) below

No doubt the texts are very similar. Artists, or their managers, regularly produce publicity sheets, often used as press releases, totally free of copyright restrictions, which would prevent the whole purpose of the material. They are produced in the hope that they will be widely used, quoted from. I support a soprano, and when she sings in Scarborough the local press there will most likely quote from her sheet of notes; when she appears in Boston, the press there is likely to come up with a very similar article, using the same or a similar information sheet that she has sent. Here, a publicity sheet has very likely been used as a basis for both the www.operavivra.com feature and the Wikipedia article. Both cover similar ground, so similarity of parts or all is unsurprising, indeed almost unavoidable. The suggestion of copyright infringement is without merit. Roy Lewis (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

He's had enough exposure that if someone had the time, they could easily write original text. -kosboot (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Indeed. But since the text is completely innocent, there is no reasonable requirement. Roy Lewis (talk) 18:57, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

My sentiments exactly. In how many different ways can one enumerate a career? Text like "has performed in many opera house ...", "has performed at ...", is admittedly plodding prose, but it's not a "creative work" that could possibly be subject to copyright. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

The first paragraph on philantrophy is largely exactly the same as in the source given about the trust. Unfortunately, infringement of copyright is not a question of interpretation or intentions, as suggested by some of the comments above, but a legal issue that WP editors are bound to respect and is one of the basic demands. - So this paragraph must be rephrased in order to protect WP from legal trouble. For anyone knowledgeable about the subject, this sould not be too difficult. Munfarid1 (talk) 11:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)