Talk:José Antonio Fortea
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Supernatual events spoken about in a factual way edit
Edited the article to convey that it was just the opinion of those involved that people that come to Fortea are possessed. Possession can not be tested nor proven and thus instances of people being "possessed" is nothing more than the opinion of observers around them--Nefariousski (talk) 22:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Give me proof that it "can not be tested nor proven." Possession has a lot of evidence behind it. If you looked into the work of Ed and Lorraine Warren you might be surprised. Your opinion is either poorly worded or it isn't a logical point. If you meant to say that many do not believe in it or just feel that it lacks appropriate evidence, that would be a valid perspective. Neurolanis (talk) 04:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)