Talk:John Smith (comics writer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Sheridan in topic Bibliography part of the article

Bibliography part of the article edit

The bibliography could use some cleanup. Any ideas? - Iotha 04:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It seems fine (although I would say that) and is in line with various others I've worked on (and there are certianly others out there that do need a tidy) - what do you suggest? The main things I see this entry needing is a better biography (more about him and other non-2000 AD things) as well as entries for the various things he has written - is there no love for a lot of his work?? (Emperor 04:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC))Reply
Biography definitely needs to be better - it currently reads as a prose bibliography rather than an actual biography. sheridan (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Extreme Edition edit

I bought last months eXtreme Edition, which had all of Revere. A little behind schedule it would seem but it is better not to examine a gift horse in the mouth since I was highly grateful for a chance to read it. Simply stunning in its eerie surrealism but don't get me started on that, page amended.

Any chance Revere could get it's own page?

Most certainly. Seems like a good idea. I redlinked it and you can start the page here: Revere (comics). Don't worry about getting it 100% as other editors will spruce it up and get it in line with other entries. The important thing is content so be bold and get the ball rolling ;) . (Emperor 19:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC))Reply
Thanks for making the page! For the moment I do not have the time {nor a home internet connection, the latter being sort of a consequence of the former} to create the article but as soon as I do I shall. :) 217.205.164.139 12:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Smith (comics writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply