Talk:John Frederick MacKay
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article was created or added to during the Victoria Cross Reference Migration. It may contain material that was used with permission from victoriacross.net. |  |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Frederick MacKay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201164246/http://www.angloboerwar.com/VC/mackay_j.htm to http://www.angloboerwar.com/VC/mackay_j.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Glaring Silence as to WWI Service
editI understand that even for VVC recipients there’s a limit to how comprehensive we can expect service record to be, especially when a good century and then some have passed. However, the brief information provided her makes it clear that he was an active officer during World War I. I cannot help but comment that the lack of any details regarding what he did during this time is perplexing. Even if he did nothing, I would imagine readers of this type of Wikipedia entry would be very appreciative of a few lines on this subject. For example, “was stationed in such and such and did not see action during WWI.” 2600:1700:B801:43C0:5B:5EDE:5143:87D (talk) 00:31, 24 June 2022 (UTC)