This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers
Still doesn't make you the first major contributor. If I remember correctly we've had a similar discussion before. According to WP:CITEVAR, it's not "the first editor" but the "first major contributor" (emphasis added) who gets to determine the citation style. I'm disappointed you try to get the upper hand by starting an edit war: the scheme I propose is WP:BRD, that is, after my revert, discussion here till consensus is reached. The guidance is rather straightforward: the first major contributor gets to determine the citation style: applying that guidance as it is would lead fairly easy to consensus, imho. --Francis Schonken (talk) 16:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Prior to your edits the article had an "established citation style"; as per CITEVAR "If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it". Your proposed interpretation is inconsistent with that guidance. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
"As with spelling differences, it is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor ... (etc)" – no, my interpretation is correct. A minimal stub, with three sentences (one of which half-nonsensical, completely rewritten in the mean while) and two references (one of which to an unreliable source, and consequently already removed), does not establish a citation style. That's why the first major contributor gets to determine the style. But again, trying to "win" by edit-warring, before engaging in honest discussion, is where it goes completely wrong. --Francis Schonken (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
