| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the What if it's a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing? page were merged into Joel Pett on 19 December 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Merger proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To merge the cartoon into the page of the author, for context and short text. Klbrain (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
@The lorax: I propose merging What if it's a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing? into Joel Pett. There is only one secondary source establishing notability in that article, and it's only three paragraphs, one of which is a short lead, and one of which is mainly a quote by Pett. This page already includes most of the information mentioned on the comic's page anyway. WPscatter t/c 04:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Oppose. There’s indeed notability. RodRabelo7 (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)- From one news article? I certainly won't argue it isn't notable enough to mention on Wikipedia - hence this merge proposal and not an AfD - but in its current state it's better as a section of the author's article. WPscatter t/c 06:12, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support They are both very small articles which are unlikely to grow very big Chidgk1 (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Chidgk1. Just not independently notable. ~ HAL333 02:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support not because the comic isn't notable without leaning on the BLP article, but the other way around; the bio subject even says as much with the quote "I've drawn 7,000 cartoons in my life, but really only one". Arlo James Barnes 08:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Chidgk1 and WPscatter's reply to RodRabelo7. Makes sense. El monty (talk) 12:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support. I think there's simply too little content here to justify a separate article. Oktayey (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.