Talk:Joaquin Castro/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joaquín Castro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joaquín Castro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

The Trump donors controversy

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

So... are we just going to ignore the tweet in which Rep. Castro put out the names and identities of his own constituents, potentially opening them up to doxing and harassment? Because we'd be screaming about this here on Wikipedia if a right-wing Republican did it. But I see the congressman's page has been help dutifully clean of any vague mention of this controversy, and of controversy in general. Disgusting hypocrisy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1c2:4c01:4cbb:2c96:9a1f:680e:24dc (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

What did he do wrong exactly? The names he tweeted out are in the public record. This sounds to me like a fake controversy. We are not here to spin on behalf of either party. I wouldn't support including it if it had been Trump tweeting out names of Castro donors. See WP:NOTNEWS. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Let's grant that he didn't do anything wrong whatsoever. Due to the formal complaint which we should expect to see dismissed in the days or weeks ahead, his name was in the news at least yesterday, Friday 8/9. As the page exists now, a casual reader could be forgiven for thinking he's called up a page on the wrong person since there's no mention of the controversy at all. This is a chance to make Wikipedia better. So "Did he do anything wrong" isn't the proper litmus test, in fact it carries us into the dangerous territory of passing judgment. MKFreeberg (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Diacritic

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there some reason why we use an acute accent to spell Julián Castro but leave it off Joaquín? Peter Chastain ^[¡hablá!] 14:18, 13 August 2019 (UTC)