| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jim B. Tucker article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2010. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 8 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jim B. Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109150408/http://www.wpr.org/book/051120a.html to http://www.wpr.org/book/051120a.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608020209/http://www.nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5759/Default.aspx to http://www.nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5759/Default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Jim B. Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604045719/http://www.storyhousepro.com/section/science to http://www.storyhousepro.com/section/science
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926213429/http://www.five.tv/programmes/extraordinarypeople/boywholived/ to http://www2.five.tv/programmes/extraordinarypeople/boywholived/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216053351/http://lifebeforelife.com/Publications.htm to http://lifebeforelife.com/Publications.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708172128/http://archive.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/08/31.html to http://archive.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/08/31.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
This article is a bit unbalanced in that it only has one comment from critics of his work, which is quickly dismissed without any detail that might help a reader decide which claim is more credible. There's a lot more coverage at Reincarnation#Skepticism, though scientific reaction to Tucker specifically, whether positive or negative, would be helpful here. -- Beland (talk) 06:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Agree that article could better conform to WP:FRINGE. Edits like this haven’t helped. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Seriously, whether he is right or wrong, how can this article possibly ever become "neutral", when his research relates to the religious and existential convictions of so many visitors and editors? It will always boil down to how agressive the "debunking" will be allowed to be.--Berig (talk) 07:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia does not itself debunk. If there are qualified sources criticizing him, then as much of this criticism as possible should be reported in his Wikipedia entry. If there are counter-criticisms, those should be reported too. The more information there is from either side, the better. Don Ecchi (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Seriously, whether he is right or wrong, how can this article possibly ever become "neutral", when his research relates to the religious and existential convictions of so many visitors and editors? It will always boil down to how agressive the "debunking" will be allowed to be.--Berig (talk) 07:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)