I reviewed this under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process

edit

Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.

In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability and in the specialized guidelines linked at the beginning of that page which provide somewhat of an alternate. If you feel that the subject of the article can meet wikipedia's notability guidelines, may I suggest that you bolster the article in those areas. The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. I noticed that the article has been tagged for notability. There is extensive coverage of his works. I marked the article as reviewed/passed, but left the tag in place and suggest that more references be found that cover him and to also use those to add more content about him to the article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 00:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply