This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
possible issue with article links to clang and gestalt
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
.. Not sure if anyone with expertise is watching this page, but thought i'd note: it seems that the link to clang is almost certainly erroneous (i'd guess it was a 'wanted' page when written, and later filled in with the current content, which appears to be irrelevant to Tenney), and that possibly the link to gestalt is unnecessarily confusing. I'm familiar with a bit of Tenney's music and have read most of hodos/meta-hodos. I'm fascinated by his concept of clang, and would like to see it done better justice. Anyhow, i'll try to do some more digging and see if i can help resolve this myself in the near future, but if anyone with more expertise has a contribution, that'd be great. baxrob (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't know if I qualify as "expert", but I was the Managing Editor of Perspectives of New Music at the time the Tenney tribute was published, and I do have some familiarity with his work. The link to clang is certainly erroneous. Clearly it was meant to link to an article on the composition of that name, and I have delinked it rather than redirecting to "Clang (Tenney)" or similar, because when someone does get around to writing an article, either about this work or about the theoretical term used in Meta (+) Hodos, he/she will certainly start from this article, and can place the link or links (in case of two separate articles) at that time. The link to Gestalt was confusing because it was to a disambiguation page. Since the intended link was evidently to gestalt theory, I have replaced the links, both here and in the article on For Ann (rising).—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Added citation link to liner notes, and for full disclosure I work for the non-profit educational resource linked to. The notes provide reference for several facts in this article, and the liner note quality is extremely high and is itself fully referenced.Ribbonabaca (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
