Talk:Isopogon latifolius

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MargaretRDonald in topic Manual data fix needed

Manual data fix needed

edit

@MargaretRDonald: the map is wrong. All occurrences outside Western Australia muct be cultivated plants. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Casliber: (Not necessarily - may be naturalised...) But I will fix. MargaretRDonald (talk) 00:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Removed until fixed. MargaretRDonald (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
It's not naturalised. it can barely stay alive in gardens on the east coast, let alone go weedy. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
A new map has replaced the old one, but everything may take a little time to sync. PS I have now checked the east coast occurrences which were all, as you said, cultivated. Curiously, the SA occurrence detailed the habitat (stringybark forest) in which it was found! MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply