A fact from Isopogon latifolius appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the wildflower Isopogon latifolius(pictured) is the showiest of the drumstick genus Isopogon?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Isopogon latifolius is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
@MargaretRDonald: the map is wrong. All occurrences outside Western Australia muct be cultivated plants. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 22:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
It's not naturalised. it can barely stay alive in gardens on the east coast, let alone go weedy. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 02:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
A new map has replaced the old one, but everything may take a little time to sync. PS I have now checked the east coast occurrences which were all, as you said, cultivated. Curiously, the SA occurrence detailed the habitat (stringybark forest) in which it was found! MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
