Template:Did you know nominations/Isopogon latifolius

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 23:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Isopogon latifolius

edit
Isopogon latifolius
Isopogon latifolius

5x expanded by Casliber (talk), Choess (talk), and Peter Greenwell (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC).

  • Review Good to go! 5X expansion, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations,. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector: Isopogon latifolius report gives it a clean bill. Picture is clear, used in article and freeely licensed. Hooks cited, faithful to sources, are hooky enough, and relate directly to the essence of the article. Interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done (but not yet promoted). I prefer ALT1, but I leave selection up to the nominator. 7&6=thirteen () 13:39, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Can go with either, TBH. I am happy with whatever the promoter picks. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)