Talk:The Web Conference
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Michigan/SI 110: Introduction to Information (Winter 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mosaic and the Web
editfound a presentation about the libwww:
WWW3
editinria and grif create a html editor --> later became amaya mabdul 13:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
WWW5
editWWW2000X
editI've removed the following alternative name since it is not explained in the given reference. Personally, I've been at the conference twice and have never heard the abbreviation "WWW2000X". –Jérôme (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- WWW2000X[1]
- ^ Herman, Ivan (1 February 2009). "International World Wide Web Conferences ("WWW2000X")". World Wide Web Consortium. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
Student improvements
editWikipedia’s stub article on the International World Wide Web Conference in its current state provides a brief overview of how the conference came to be, its organization mechanisms, and the location of past and future conferences. As a group of students enrolled in an introductory information studies course at the University of Michigan, we hope to improve the quality of the article by providing additional, reliable information about the mission of the conference and the work it does each year. To do so, we plan to add an entire section on the Conference’s set-up, highlighting the mechanisms through which its main purpose is achieved. Ashleypcooper (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge
editI've proposed that First International Conference on the World-Wide Web be merged here as the actual encyclopedic content is very short, with the rest being a list of award recipients of which very few have article links. — Scott • talk 15:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose, the first conference has enough content on its own to warrant its own page. --Frmorrison (talk) 21:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- There are barely two paragraphs of distinct content of merit. That's not enough. — Scott • talk 22:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)