This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This page was proposed for deletion for a number of reasons. However these are not easily resolved. The page was created by the editor of the journal. I could have asked someone else to do this but it would not make any material difference to the objectivity of the page. The journal is a peer reviewed publication by a respected publisher so this should not be grounds for removal. There are no references, but this would not be appropriate for a journal page that is essentially informational. I have added further associated publications and indices to reinforce the validity of the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dparsonsnz (talk • contribs)
I have looked at a number of other journal pages in Wikipedia and would appreciate reference to one that is considered a suitable template for such pages. The IJMBL page is similar to (or better than) many others. I assume that Wikipedia does not consider peer reviewed academic journals to be inappropriate content per se 130.123.104.22 (talk) 23:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
If you let me know which pages you were looking at, I can deal with them too. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
