Talk:International Federation of American Football

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 2604:2D80:800A:8168:A911:BCA8:420A:D2FA in topic Schism

IFAF Regional Bodies edit

For now I'm pulling OFAF off the list. The body does not exist on the IFAF official listing and google searches do not return a site either. IFAF members in the Oceania region, such as Gridiron Australia, report directly to IFAF and do not go through a regional body. However, if someone can find credible sources please feel free to add it again. --Bren talk 04:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to go ahead and add it back, as it is listed on the IFAF website [1]. BDota (talk)

Clarity edit

Under goals, what does "Participation in the World Games as well as the Olympic Games to be stong to play football" mean? I can't figure out what "stong" means, and "strong" doesn't fit the context. - BillCJ (talk) 05:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

New Zealand edit

Can anyone confirm that New Zealand was suspended? BDota (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC).Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Schism edit

There is currently a de facto schism with more than one group claiming to be the legitimate head of IFAF. Why is this not mentioned anywhere on this article? Hobbitschuster (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • No one has put it in yet, If you have the time go ahead and begin it, the nearly official schism between the "New York" and "Paris" factions should be noted, with a list of nations in both groups, their Presidents and the expulsion of USA Football from IFAF Paris, AFI is a good place to start, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport is going to hear a case for legitimacy. 93.182.215.115 (talk) 00:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Apparently CAS has decided against the Paris faction led by Tommy Wiking, which means that once the decision is officially published this article will represent only the illegitimate side. In this case the article should be rewritten according to the CAS opinion and possibly a separate new article be created for Wiking's post-2015 organization should they choose to ignore the court decision. -2001:14BA:1FFE:6900:8528:3E73:4B83:660D (talk) 11:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
They haven't actually determined which one is official, just that Wiking had resigned, while records in Paris say Maclean, Wiking's group is still seated in Paris, with the other group in New York. There has to be a way to get that across better, plus there are plenty of problems that have to be noted where different factions ran different tournaments.2604:2D80:800A:8168:A911:BCA8:420A:D2FA (talk) 00:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply