This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
It seems like use is more like "Propoganda" is done by "them" (The communists, the Koreans, the germans etc.) and Infoganda is "Propoganda" done by our side "US Government"
The idea is that it is propoganda in a infomercial format. Who does it doesn't matter. The infomercial format is key; the sales techniques used on infomercials is consistent and distinct from other forms of sales methods.
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article has problems. The wording is composed of too much unencyclopedic prose currently; I buy relevance, but we have some original research, weasel words, awkward sentences, lack of citations, etc, etc. It needs a good cleanup and citation. I doubt a rewrite will be necessary, but shortening for brevity would help, too. Also, link it out where relevant (seriously lacking backlinks). 65.112.197.16 01:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply