Talk:Industrial sickness
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Osiris (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
India Education Program course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.
The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 20:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Move suggestion
editThis article has been flagged as being basically a dictionary definition, and I concur. The two sensible solutions that readily come to mind are:
- rename the article Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 and rewrite it accordingly; or
- redirect the article to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 § Background.
The former strikes me as preferrable, provided that someone is up for the extra work that it would entail. —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 11:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)