Talk:In scale
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Western terms
editHow would you write this scale in western terms?
- Please sign your posts on talk pages per Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks!
- Regarding writing the scale in "western terms", look at the images in the current article. Hyacinth (talk) 10:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Math
editHehe 112.204.116.248 (talk) 00:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hdhh
editMatma 112.204.116.248 (talk) 00:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Karnataka Shuddha Saveri and In scale "almost identical"?
editFrom my reading here, the scales don't look particularly similar, while the In and the Gunkali are indeed near-synonyms. I'll dig a bit more in case I'm missing something about modes, but I might remove this half of the claim unless someone tells me otherwise. Dhalamh (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
What does "in a traditional theory" mean?
editIn the first sentence, the definition of the in scale is qualified with "in a traditional theory". It seems like someone put it there intentionally, but as a nonexpert I don't know what it's trying to convey. Is there a modern theory in which the in scale is something different? Or does modern theory call into question whether the in scale exists? Either way it should be stated in the text. In the absence of clarification I think it's better to remove that phrase, but I figured I would see if anyone here knows what's up before doing so. Justin Kunimune (talk) 16:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)