Talk:Iconodulism

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Johnbod in topic Merge

Move to Wiktionary edit

As I said about the iconoclast article, it is not much more than a detailed dictionary entry. This article does not look like it is going in a encyclopedic directior or has the potential to do so.--chemica 21:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I beg to differ. It's a stub, not a dicdef. The history of iconodulism and famous iconodulists could be included in the article (not that I know the subject myself). 25 articles on iconodulism or iconodulists already link to this article, so it is in need of expansion, not deletion.--Father Goose 21:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

Surely it should be merged with Byzantine iconoclasm since it adds very little if anything to that page, and is actually at odd with that page. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 12:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

But is the use of the word entirely restricted to Byzantines? I think not. Johnbod (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Softening on this .... Johnbod (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)Reply