Talk:iProvo

Learn more about this page

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Original research

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This section from the Broadweave criticism section appears to be original research. It's not sufficient to cite facts about the company. We need citations for the criticism itself.

Broadweave primarily has experience developing in new developments ("greenfields") whereas Provo is an "overbuild" or "brownfield" development delivering services to existing homes. Broadweave has little experience with sales and marketing since it has not been in competitive markets, something that caused the original exclusive retailer, HomeNet, to end up declaring bankruptcy.
Broadweave currently has less than 1100 customers^[1] and reported around 800 customers two years ago. iProvo has 10,250 customers as of April of 2008, nearly 10 times what Broadweave currently serves. The company also has aggressive expansion plans with applications open in Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas.^[2] It is also rumored to be purchasing the defunct OEN FTTH system in Houston. Since these are capital-intensive projects, the company runs the possibility of burning through capital too quickly and folding.

JustinTalbot (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've added citations for the criticism I could find in published sources. Still haven't found anything to cite for the preceeding paragraphs. 21:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC) JustinTalbot (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've added back the paragraphs with the citation of a published editorial showing the source of the criticism (which is, not coincidentally, me). Hopefully that meets appropriate guidelines for citation. --Elforesto (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Deseret News Broadweave officials hit with tough questions May 13, 2008
^ Telephony Online, Greenfield players pursue fiber land grab Dec. 11, 2006

Google Fiber announces intent to purchase iProvo

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

https://fiber.google.com/cities/provo/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.100.173.158 (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Deseret News Broadweave officials hit with tough questions May 13, 2008

[2] Telephony Online, Greenfield players pursue fiber land grab Dec. 11, 2006

[1]

[2]