Talk:Hyperspectral imaging

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Heartmusic678 in topic Nonexistant(?) source. Title needed.

October 2006 edit

I removed this phrase: "That's why it is used in target detection and tracking applications." This article, as it stands, deals with electron-probe microanalysis, not mapping the Earth. Perhaps another article, such as Hyperspectral mapping, would be a more appropriate area for target detection, etc. Cm the p 18:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

March 2009 edit

Removing the phrase was a mistake. Hyperspectral imaging does indeed include imaging the earth, for example, there is a NASA satellite called Hyperion, and it's not really mapping per se, in the sense of cartography -- it's creating an image that is then interpreted against a map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfzimmerman (talkcontribs) 15:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

Clarified the section "Different hyperspectral imaging technologies" and added two citations. Mowryand May 30, 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

Deleted a bit that looked like advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.50.94.200 (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

Added a fourth technique of hyperspectral data acquisition, and optimized the structure of that section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sascha Grusche (talkcontribs) 14:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Summary of all changes introduced by me: corrected content regarding non-scanning, introduced spatio-spectral scanning according to a recent publication, optimized content and structure in the first few sections; added diagrams and photos to update and illustrate the hyperspectral imaging techniques. June 10, 2014, Sascha Grusche. Sascha Grusche (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014 edit

Updated reference for spatio-spectral scanning. Sascha Grusche (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

The definition of hyperspectral (HS) opposed to spectral (S) and ultraspectral (US) seems to be a bit vague. The given description supposes that an imaging system is HS if it leaves no gaps in the spectral coverage. The human eye is thus a hyperspectral imaging system: it covers wavelengths from 350nm to 700nm with no gap between each of the three spectral bands (red, green and blue).Janschween (talk) 13:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2015 edit

Very nice article. I think it is missing a significant part in biomedical applications. It is missing another technology for measuring spectral images based on Fourier spectroscopy, which is used intensively for different applications, as well as important applications such as spectral karyotyping (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karyotype). Although it is a free platform, I do not want to interfere with a perspective that may be outside of the scope of this term. If there is no objection, I think it is important to add it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ygarini (talkcontribs) 14:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Archaeology edit

The topic of hyperspectral remote sensing was described in an interview of Sarah Parcak in the The Late Show with Stephen Colbert recently [1]. It would be great if we could write up a little section about it's application in archaeological studies. Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nonexistant(?) source. Title needed. edit

This source: Schurmer, J.H., (Dec 2003), Air Force Research Laboratories Technology Horizons is practically worthless, as it does not have a retrievable equivalent. I suggest removing it or amending it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaterFindus (talkcontribs) 22:46, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


  • What I think should be changed:

In paragraph: Distinguishing hyperspectral from multispectral imaging After the first sentence I would like to add:

The technology appeared in the mid-1980s using the terms spectral imaging or imaging spectroscopy. Soon the community more and more pointed it as 'hyperspectral imaging'. Since this technology can not be longer mentioned as groundbreaking, experts recommend the use of the more appropriated original terms.

  • Why it should be changed:

To propose appropriate terminology.

  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

[1]

[2]

Gpolder (talk) 18:01, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Polder, Gerrit; Gowen, Aoife (27 February 2020). "The hype in spectral imaging". Journal of Spectral Imaging. 9. doi:10.1255/jsi.2020.a4.
  2. ^ "AVIRIS - Airborne Visible InfraRed Imaging Spectrometer". Retrieved 30 June 2021.
 Y Done. Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply