 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Meloe pustulatus page were merged into Hycleus pustulatus on 30 December 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Meloe pustulatus merge
editMeloe pustulatus has sources (and the entire text aside from the title) referring to Mylabris pustulata, which redirects here. Content from that article should be merged here. Plantdrew (talk) 19:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Current name
edit@Plantdrew: I note your 2021 move of Mylabris pustulata to Hycleus pustulatus. Do you have evidence for the new name? The databases still seem to be sticking with Mylabris. If the scientific consensus doesn't support the move, perhaps a technical move back to Mylabris pustulata? For context, I came to this through the merge proposal listed above, merging from Meloe pustulatus, which none of the sources accept as the correct name. I'm not a plant expert, so apologies in advance if I've missed something obvious! Klbrain (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Certainly if Hycleus pustulatus is not
'''''Hycleus pustulatus'''''in the lede something is wrong. Invasive Spices (talk) 30 December 2022 (UTC)- Several of the pictures show Hycleus phaleratus (and related species). It is a mess. - see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294299/ Shyamal (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- According to doi:10.1080/00222930110062318 page 46 it should be Hycleus pustulatus. Shyamal (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Several of the pictures show Hycleus phaleratus (and related species). It is a mess. - see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4294299/ Shyamal (talk) 17:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)