Talk:Hurricane Dog (1950)

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Hurricaned1234 in topic Intensity
Featured articleHurricane Dog (1950) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starHurricane Dog (1950) is part of the 1950 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 27, 2009.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 2, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 5, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
January 28, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Todo edit

Of course there's not going to be much more to put in the impact section. I think it would be more interesting to add another section on the lack of pressure measurements for this storm, and why that was done. Specifically, I myself am interested to know how they got windspeed measurements without measuring the pressure. Jdorje 04:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Better? Hurricanehink 21:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Todo2: inline sources. Jdorje 21:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
I agree, jdorje. I still think Dog had lower pressure than 900mb and WAAAAYYY lower than the 979 mb they estimated on the page.
The 979 isn't an estimate, it's the actual measurement...taken from when the hurricane hit the Caribbean as a Category 1. But after the storm moved north and strengthened, they kept taking air windspeed measurements but stopped taking pressure measurements for some reason. — jdorje (talk) 20:48, 23 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Damage edit

"Damage was placed at $2 million in lost revenue" ... so which is it? Lost revenue is not damage. — jdorje (talk) 04:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA pass edit

Meets all GA criteria; referenced, stable, and well-written. -Phoenix 23:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Name? edit

It IS "Dog", right? And not some elaborate vandal convincing everyone it's not "Doug"? Kingoomieiii (talk) 15:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, as in Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog, Echo in phonetic spelling. Acroterion (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

are all hurricanes going to end up as FA? edit

there has been so many hurricanes as FA, I lost count.... we need to have a variety of topics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.9.233 (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hopefully. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
See also 2007 Wikipedia hurricane season Raul654 (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dog "avoiding" land edit

In the article, it mentions Hurricane Dog as one of only 3 category 5's to avoid land - but Dog did hit, or pass by, Antigua as a hurricane, so it did not avoid land altogether. Should that be changed in the article? I think Dog should not be left as a category 5 that missed land, but as one that made a direct hit to land, like Hurricane Fabian of 2003 did so on Bermuda. Rye998 (talk) 05:14, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hurricane Dog (1950). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

WP:URFA/2020 edit

  • Alt text for track
  • duplicate links
  • reference inconsistencies
  • unsourced statement
  • couldn't find any significant academic literature on this so it's fine on that end (not an issue, just a note that I checked for this)

Leaving this as notes. CCI check not done. NoahTalk 01:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Mitchazenia: Would you be able to fix these issues so I can mark this as satisfactory? NoahTalk 01:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Intensity edit

Someone putted that Dot peaked as a category 5, with winds of 185mph, is it right? Hurricaned1234 (talk) 01:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, Dog was downgraded in 2014. See here. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 18:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh thanks :) Hurricaned1234 (talk) 01:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply